Ministerial Incompetence – Connect the Dots.

 

A brief wibble by government department from a Red Pill perspective.

Once Bray coughs up the pints he owes me for grievous defeats on Cricket Championship we’ll be covering this via youtube on Chaffers and Bray

Can you spot the connections?

 

The most incompetent of them all? ( Ministry of Demoralisation)

 

Should be the blokiest but their ability to cock any and all projects up is legendary. You might be tempted to think that having 57,000 cucks ‘taking care of’ about 140,000 service personnel should be a jolly good ratio to ensure their needs are met.

Well if launching endless war crimes witchunts to prosecute serving soldiers who have been cleared by the previous half dozen witchunts is ‘taking care of’ then I think we may be talking more of a mafia definition of the term.

On accommodation and basic rights they fail utterly. Demoralisation seems to be the aim. I recall joining a regular unit for the first time and being shown to my single room accomodation ( I know it was such as I was charged board for it) which comprised of a 4 man room with curtains separating each bed.

One bloke was AWOL, the second about to be chucked out for a drugs offence and the third ginger and terrified of everything.

Whilst our forces were desperately short of helicopters in Afghanistan 8 brand new Chinooks were rotting away in a shed somewhere. Examples are legion.

This blog is an excellent example of a cuck book for instance. Mangina positively glistening at the recent documentary featuring four women and barely any blokes on the new aircraft carriers. The Red Arrows are red, and pretty! Far better than nasty weapons and stuff – for which this ex senior cuck has some wonderfully self contradictory excuses..

 

Educashun

 

“It isn’t a game, it’s just a rout” sang a fat bloke with much better tits than most feminists, and he might have been talking about the gender gap in education.

Women massively outnumber men at university in almost every field, the only exceptions being maths, physics and IT. Which is clearly a problem.

The solution is STEMM and hiding the preponderance of women on medicinal science courses ( men in psychology are a very rare breed for instance) to make it appear that women are disadvantaged in the tiny number of courses they do not already dominate.

Course feminists believe in equality of outcome, which makes the gender gap in teaching rather hard to square. Finding a primary school with a single male teacher might be problematic, finding female teachers who don’t mark the same work with a boy’s name on it significantly lower a less well known one.

 

 Department for Foreign Fanny Scratching (International Development)

 

Think of Foreign Aid and you’ll probably have an image in your head of a military transport aircraft doling out bundles of food in some drought stricken place. Under foreign fanny scratching rules however this wouldn’t even come from their budget, though technically it all comes under defence… Which is a right laugh.

The reality is quite different as most of the entire huge budget is devoted to feminist causes around the world. Interfering in foreign cultures takes the form of funding Eritrean versions of the spice girls and sub Saharan lesbians knitting yellow fin, nomadic condoms out of free range yoghurt raised on the shores of Mt. Fuji.

No stone is left unturned in the hunt for throwing our cash at feminist causes. India may have a space programme but they need feminist funding too!

And the scale is huuuuuuge. For every £9 we spend on the NHS ( more later) we spend £1 on allowing some dizzy tart ( it’s always a dizzy tart) defending our foreign aid budget with some graceless virtue signalling.

 

Department of Fun ( Media, Culture and Sport)

 

I really could not be more sick of seeing BBC bias threads on forums where lefties and righties argue endlessly on which way the BBC leans. It does so towards feminism, and horizontally so at that.

Political correctness, pro-immigration, pro-fetus murdering, rabid radical feminist bollocks. They don’t even try to hide it anymore.

The cringeing, but huge budget, Olympics opening ceremony was their work. As it trying to make out that a few dykes who would be thrashed by Accrington Stanley are equal professionals to whichever men’s game.

Women’s cricket is pretty good though, very spinny.

 

Department for Looking after Foreigners ( Foreign and Commonwealth Office)

 

“The ministry of Agriculture looks after cows and the Foreign Office looks after foreigners.” said Margaret Thatcher. Which is nice.

It is remarkably difficult to discern what else they do as that would mean looking for Foreign policy successes. Which over the last 100 years have been rather thin on the ground. If not altogether absent.

A bit like looking for French military victories.

Despite palaces and oodles of cash, not to mention inumerable honours doled out, can anyone actually convey what the FO’s foreign policy actually is? I’ll give you a clue, preventing sexual violence in conflict is a key concern of theirs…. Though as Boko Haram was roundly ignored whilst they burned thousands young blokes alive the moment they kidnapped some girls….. The world took notice.

Kidnapped that is, not….dead.

Until just before the referendum our brave and oh so superior Knights were confidently telling every foreign diplomat that we would vote to remain in the EU by a large margin. Hence the department entrusted to predict and analyse trends in foreign fields displayed quite conclusively that they didn’t have a clue about their own country. 🙂

Don’t be confused by the Commonwealth in the title of this ministry.. They couldne give a shite about anything outside the EU.

 

 Ministry of (partial) Justice

 

To be fair to them they did notice that three out of four men in prison wouldn’t be there had they opted for a swift sex change. And that those men in prison spent on average 6.5 times longer in the clink than females who had committed the same crimes.

Equality under the law my arse.

They published it in a report and everything.. Though no-one in the media covered it.

Meanwhile the fuckwit radical feminists in the Crown Prosecution Service prosecute blokes merely accused of sexual crimes with a disregard for exculpatory evidence that would shame a kangaroo court. Evidence of almost equal victimhood for blokes in domestic violence is folded in with that against women to make the numbers appear more shocking.

Also the secret family courts have been turned into shooting galleries where social workers have great fun perjuring themselves to rape blokes of their families and reputations.

Possibly the sickest of the sadistic in the list.

And about to get even sicker! David Gauk has announced to much fanfare that women will be spared prison sentences unless absolutely necessary… As though they aren’t already…

In the name of equality?

 

Ministry of housing and.. stuff.

 

We need more houses right? For social justice say the left, to house immigrants say the right.

Well in fact the housing stock has gone up by several million in a relatively short period of time. The biggest single pressure?

That would be no fault divorce and the breakdown of marriage. With canny blokes selecting the MGTOW gear and women taking their natural right to nick half of a married bloke’s stuff whilst destroying his life it means you need more houses to accommodate singles and separated rather than familes.

On social housing though, where do you think a single bloke in dire need would find himself on the housing ladder? On the streets is the answer, hence why 93% of the homeless are men.

So if you’re a young dude reading this and wondering whether you’ll ever own your own house the answer is probably only if you don’t marry. If you do you’ll lose it more than 50% of the time.

Feminism has consequences huh? Whooda thunked it.

 

 The Treasonr.. Erm I mean Treasury

 

Fewer than 2000 cucks need £3Bn per annum to come up with economic justifications for mass immigration and manpower in the middle of the second industrial revolution where robotics is the way forward!

There must be gold in them thar paper clip stacks!

Course giving women indirect tax breaks and producing reports so hilariously wrong on future economic trends that they make North Korea’s propaganda look professional takes… creative talent.

So too does trying to block brexit by every means possible.

We should pity them as being an anachronism. The City of London trader chappies pay top dollar for real time economists, the treasonry works on data months old and still can’t get a shot within the corner flags, never mind the goal.

 

Department for work and pensions

 

So women live for longer… and get their pensions sooner. Currently 5 years sooner. Hence the blokes who pay 75% of the tax burden, often whilst working in jobs which are physically demanding, are likely to receive a state pension worth about half as much overall. Equality huh?

Feminists of course campaign endlessly to get more women into top positions such as MPs or on the board of directors of companies. Which by the way tends to reduce their profits and effectiveness.

Would more women in Parliament be a good thing? Well it depends upon the women as Parliament is massively overstocked with feminists of both sexes, but with very few normal healthy females.

All feminist shortlists, as practised by both parties have seen to this. Which raises the question as to whether normal healthy women are represented by feminists. I doubt it.

 

 The Department for Transport

 

Included for completeness. Though… sorry dudes. I got nothing.

 

The Cabinet Office

 

A bit like Top Gun for cucks. If you’ve abandoned all hope of ever finding anything lumpy in your trousers and are truly committed to a Marxist way of life you might have the opportunity to pit your witless self against the Ministry supposedly responsible under our constitution. As in one headed by an elected representative. Someone who is responsible to us.

Rules of engagement be damned, or the civil service code for that matter… Evry fule kno that elected people can’t be trusted to compile policy. Only our deep state, who actually seem to work for the EU commission, should be trusted with such things.

Whether you be a National Security Advisor ( an economist) bravely and rightly avoiding any awkward questions from MPs or in charge of presenting a Brexit plan that the minister for Exiting the EU hasn’t seen once in 2 years your job is to be the best at subverting parliamentary accountability and standards in the land…

 

 Department against fishermen, farmers or anything else male and 3D job sounding.

 

Used to be called Maff, which was a bit too close to Muff, and almost gave the game away. Farmers being ruined and committing suicide? Fishermen with no quota to fish because no-one gives a shit about male 3D jobs? Don’t expect any help. Quite the opposite.

According to their figures I ate half of my yearly quota of fish at Wetherspoons last week, seeing as they think the entire industry is worth £1 billion a year, or about £15 quid per person.

And our farmers couldn’t survive without EU handouts… Nor did they in the thousand years before we joined the EU. All those green fields and well kept countryside are their work, not those of the farmers over countless generations. And those bird chomping windmills are not crucifixes to stupidity, they are modernity and progress.

Course if you need half a county to be flooded or draconian dystopian bastardry to be implemented which hobbles dairy farmers, beef farmers or any other male profession they they is good.

Hell we used to have fresh local milk delivered in recycled glass bottles by electric vehicles.. But they saw to that. Milk men you see. All that getting up early in the cold wasn’t attractive to our precious darling feminists who want comfortable warm jobs. Like in supermarkets.

 

 The Home Orifice

 

The daddy department of them all. Or rather sisterhood department.

Must always be a feminist in charge as they have jurisdiction over mass immigration. And a feminist’s favourite policy must not be questioned.

And we wouldn’t want trifles such as the mass pedophilic rape of 4500 schoolgirls in Rotherham, Telford etc getting out would we? And to be fair they were largely successful in this, kept it quiet for at least a decade or more.

A report recently showed that every Home Secretary since the intrinsically feminist Blair Government was well aware of the ‘Asian Grooming Gangs’ though no Japanese people were involved. They certainly kept a lid on it.

 

 Department of Health and Social Care

 

A stand up once quipped that men die 10 years earlier because they are married, and therefore want to. Though this bunch have a finger in the pie.

51% of the population are born male, though only 48% make it. And as 14 of the top 15 preventable diseases disproportionately affect males in the UK you might be surprised to hear that Breast Cancer is the exception, the 15th.

Answers on a postcard for which receives the most funding, research and media attention!

Please also mention on said postcard when you last heard male suicide mentioned, the single biggest killer of people under 40.

But these people care… socially. Which basically means training and equipping an army of social workers. And then lobbying for ever increasing funding for them so they can child snatch, break up families and alienate fathers such that the epidemic of fatherless children is running at close to 40%. Ably abetted by social work degrees which encompass a wide range of influences.. feminism, radical feminism and… A bit more feminism.

If that is they were their children to begin with. DNA tests are cheap and easy but that more than 10% of children are actually raised under false paternity is a closely guarded secret.

You read that right. the last study by the CSA ( a bit like Jeremy Kyle only with threats of financial extortion) found about 25% of false paternity. As in a quarter of blokes who thought they were Dads… weren’t.

But surely it’s your right to know whether the children you raise are genetically yours?!

How naive, DNA actually means Do Not Ask what your missus was up to whilst getting pregnant. If you are on the birth certificate then you are the father, not that having an accurate family genetic history of health problems isn’t crucially important in modern diagnoses. It is.

But you have no reproductive rights in the first place.. Zero. Hence at least they are consistent.

I would like to see how much of the NHS’s budget is spent on males versus females… Though suspect the answer is pretty obvious.

If estrogen levels had dropped 30% since the late 80s in women in the West across the board, and 65% in some major cities, do you think it would be an issue? A medical issue and public health concern? Well testosterone levels in Western males decrease by an extra 1% per year and nobody even  seems to have noticed.

 

So…. Can you connect the dots?

 

Can you see a pattern in the incompetence?  The direction of travel, the division of resources? The muppetry and the blindness?

It’s worth remembering that those two eminent muppets, Statler and Waldorf, whilst endless critics were actually part of the show.

And what, Champ, is your part in the show?

It might be worth considering where the incompetence and blindness manifested itself from in the first place….

Could it be that clapping and cheering like a trained seal whilst deciding where to put your X in a box whilst someone virtue signalled about caring for women was actually dehumanising?

See it’s inbuilt. Part of our makeup and you don’t get extra brownie points for it. Though accepting someone as virtuous because they claimed to care about women more than you do diminishes your own moral authority.

Maybe time to take stock and consider where the gender gaps actually lie, rather than where they tell you they do?

Lets talk about Rape

And no, I don’t necessarily mean the physical act. Or Rotherham, Telford and the other areas where the social services have allowed and enabled organised mass pedophilic rape to occur. Though we will come back to this.. Particularly the omerta or silence regarding it.

I’m talking about the other meaning and how it applies to blokes, defined by dictionary.com as..

3. an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation:

the rape of the countryside.

So how do you rape a bloke?

How do you abuse, plunder or violate a man? Physical rape is one aspect of this however I wonder whether it is necessarily wrong to equate this to other forms.

I would posit that any man who has been to one of the secret family courts in the UK has likely been raped. Not by being overpowered by a violent homosexual hiding in a cupboard, but by the state.

For instance take Pete Middleton’s 2014 documentary Traffic. Which is rather deliberately difficult to get hold of. Whilst it is listed on Amazon for just £84.99 the reviews relate to the Benicio Del Toro movie of the same name.

It contains a harrowing scene shot on a mobile phone where the police lie to gain entry to a man’s house, and then rip his new born baby from it’s mother’s arms. As a bloke he couldn’t have done more to protect his family, yet it was violated and abused. He was raped.

Traffic 2014 extract

Indeed take all of the victims who contributed footage and their stories to the making of that film. They were raped, raped by the state. Their families abused and despoiled. Often by violent seizure too.

It takes a remarkably brave man to speak out about such things, to tell their stories. They don’t do it for sympathy or the protective cloak of victimhood that women enjoy, merely to warn others of dangers to their own families.

In order to do so they relive their violation. They deserve our compassion and gratitude for doing so.

What do we value?

In order to plunder, despoil or violate it’s worth considering what we, as blokes, value the most. The greater the value to ourselves, the greater the violation.

If cars were what we valued most then the deliberate keying of a man’s car would be the greatest violation, for instance. Outside of those who endlessly watch repeats of Top Gear on Dave this probably isn’t relevant.

I would suggest that the one thing men value above all other things is our relationships. Whether that be friends, family or intimate ones. In order to form relationships your reputation plays a key part. If you have a reputation for being a scumbag then you will struggle. Especially in intimate relationships.

Indeed there is much evidence that men value their intimate relationships far more than women do. Take the following from Dr Tom Golden on relational aggression..

Relational Aggression

As men tend to initiate relationships with women they take relational aggression as a serious threat, though not a personal threat. It therefore slips under the radar in most cases.

Logically if most relational aggression is from women, then it shows that they value the relationship less, though can use the threat of as a means to control. If the relationship ends they will be chased, wined and dined by other blokes. For the bloke they would have to chase, wine and dine.

Most people would agree that a man’s rightful role is to protect his family and to ( at least help) provide for it. Knowing about relational aggression is one step to enable you to do the former; to spot trouble early and prevent it from escalating, potentially into third party abuse.

The Rape epidemic(s)

Do we live in a society where men are the victims of rape? Emphatically yes! In fact it is institutionalised and even celebrated.

Take divorce. From blue skies and on a clear day a man’s wife tells him that she wants a divorce. She has been carrying on an affair unbeknownst to him ( itself an act of relational aggression) and wants to leave him. What are his prospects?

Well going from loving and providing for his family to the stress and torment of divorce proceedings is bad enough. He will more than likely lose his house, have to pay a large part of his wages to the Child Support Agency and will also have his reputation damaged.

Worst of all she will get custody of the children and he will be allowed to ‘visit’ them on weekends. Which is an obscenity. He will be stripped of his right to protect his family and expected merely to provide money.

Note the role of the state here in providing third party abuse. Whilst faultless he will lose his children and most of his possessions and be compelled by the state to comply with the woman’s wishes.

He has been raped. That which he prized most, his familial relationship, has been defiled, violated and abused. Let’s call it what it is.

The only fault here is his wife’s infidelity and relational aggression.

And you wondered why the MGTOW community was growing exponentially..

I can only imagine how a man who is the victim of wrongful paternity feels. Violated? Abused? Almost certainly.

What of a man wrongfully accused of sexual harassment, domestic violence, domestic abuse or even racism? The very accusation of such is rather abusive in my view, not to mention violating his reputation. He might be plundered of his job based upon merely an accusation of the former.

And of his relationship. His wife and kids moved to a domestic violence shelter and eventually rehoused elsewhere. It is an act of rape facilitated by the state.

How dare you! That isn’t proper rape!

Quite. It’s worse.

If I had a choice between being the victim of a violent homosexual or having my family destroyed, children taken into care and reputation wrecked I’d almost certainly, and reluctantly, take one for the team. I wouldn’t be buying Bubba any flowers afterwards but at least that which I prize most would be safe.

Do you think the victims of social services would prize their anal virginity above the safety of their families? Granted there are almost 90,000 children in care and rising, hence almost certainly not enough violent male homosexuals to go around if there were such a perverse choice.

How many social workers are there though?

The Perfect Rapist.

If you were to design the perfect rapist would it look like Bubba just after the prison lights went out or the soap slipped out of your hand in the shower?

Or something else? If you gave the problem to an engineer, what would he come up with?

Let’s say we take one of those awful blue haired creatures you always see on the news protesting about something or other. The butch looking man hating mastodons with cankles always shrieking in someone’s face. Curiously enough they’re usually social workers on the sick.

Let’s give them legal immunity from defamation such that they can lie and destroy reputations at will. Then let’s, as part of their training, indoctrinate them in radical feminism. All men are rapists and all women are victims.

Let’s then make it financially advantageous to their employers that they seek children to snatch and get teachers and the wider public to unknowingly tip them off to situations where they might find it easier. Pay for every penny out of central government funds, such that it costs a local authority nothing. I say easier as I doubt any family no matter how well grounded or loving could survive their malign presence.

Then let’s set up a system of secret courts where ‘justice’ cannot be overseen. Where abuses cannot be covered by the media and even the mention of such could lead to jail.

Well it wouldn’t work… Clearly if said blue haired mastodon perjured themselves repeatedly then someone would notice. It would be their word against the families.

So, let’s call them professionals!

No matter how slovenly or illiterate if we call them professionals and direct the secret courts to give more weight to their testimony than anyone else’s then…. Yes, I think we’ve got it…. Might well be the Perfect Rapist.

Marketing the Perfect Rapist

A good engineer however will ensure that his product is easy to replicate, such that the company producing it can grow.

Well if we want the Perfect Rapist to really succeed then we need to justify their existence. We also need to ensure they are cheap to make. Noone is going to demand more Perfect Rapists just on a whim, and sales is all about establishing a need. Marketing it to the public too and making it an ever expanding industry..

Quite a problem!

Making them cheap is simple enough. The lure of professional status with the lowest entry requirements of any profession should see to that. Hopefully should attract the sociopathic, socially inept, the slobs and the craven.

To establish a need though we are going to need some help. It’s unlikely that people will order the Perfect Rapist from amazon so let’s fire some binmen and charge Perfect Rapists to the taxpayer.

Now if we open our borders to people from cultures hostile to our way of life… and ignore any rapes or crimes they commit then we can say we need Perfect Rapists to protect the very children we are allowing to be raped!

Genius. Perfect engineering.

But, what about whistleblowers?

Our engineer has thought of this, he taps his pipe knowingly, smirks and asks, “What whistleblowers?”

What of the children being raped? They will complain, obviously..

“Ah”, says the engineer, “You haven’t thought it through. We’ll call them racist for complaining. And they’ll be complaining to the Perfect Rapists. People tend to forget that political correctness is a feminist theory of social change.”

Ok, the press and TV stations… Newspapers, the media?

“Staffed mainly by feminists these days old sport. Feminists don’t criticise other feminists, in fact I think you’ll find many of them running stories about how we need more Perfect Rapists to stop the actual rapists. If they mention it at all..”

Social Workers themselves? What about when they retire, move jobs, what if they speak out?

“Hmmm.. There won’t be many, not even a handful” says the engineer. “When their main job is stealing children and they’ve perjured themselves silly to do so they aren’t going to speak against their former employers. Are they now?”.

But… People will notice. People will realise that something is wrong!

“You think? If anything…”, he says lighting his pipe, “..they’ll notice young children being raped by beastly men. Which is a great recruiting sergeant for feminism. All blokes being nasty violent rapists etc.”

Surely the police will do something? Child protection officers and the like?

The engineer shrugs, “Maybe, some. The few males ones. Not many though. You are a bloke and I’m sure you laugh if someone gets hit in the happy sack. Natural reaction, they are a genetic competitor. Course you think all women are princesses who wouldn’t view another woman’s reproductive organs as competitors in the gene pool.. We’ll see.”

This is monstrous. Despicable. An outrage!

“No,” says the engineer whimsically, “This is the UK”.