On cucks and cultural Marxism

The urban dictionary defines a cuck thus:

A man who is desperate for acceptance, approval, and affection from women. This desperation has led to the compromise of his beliefs and values, the desecration of his dignity and self-worth, and his inability to stand up for himself and what he deserves as a human being, eg. loyalty, fidelity, and honesty in a romantic relationship.

And we all know at least one of them. Usually the object of great ridicule and mickey taking down the pub but have you ever considered the political significance of the cuck?

Think back to the last time you bothered to watch anything but sport on the TV. Did you notice anything about the male characters whether real life or fictional?

If TV stereotypes are to be believed then you will either be a cuck of some varying degree, or a hapless idiot. Choose to raise a family for instance and the best thing that you can hope for, according to the media, is a Homer Simpson like existence, unless you go full cuck of course.

Dare to be religious and you’ll even get cucks in cassocks showing you the true light of righteousness. Two thousand year old doctrine be damned.


The political cuck


Whilst #browgate was and is hilarious one can only assume that Canuck stands for Canadian cuck, judging by their choice of leader.

Whilst we await the inevitable South Park episode it’s worth wondering how anyone ever took Justine seriously. How did a population that is presumably about 50% male vote for someone who clearly revels in taking an anti-male stance on any and every issue? And is a colossal asshat to boot?

The answer is simply that he was previously lost in the noise, it would be a challenge to name a single politician under the age of 50 who the word cuck does not apply to. They are however the amateurs, the copy cats of the cuck world.


The Great Cuck Repository


To find the true eunuchs and leaders of the pack, in an oxymoronic way, one must take to watch Parliamentary TV when a senior civil servant is questioned by a select committee. You can smell the grilled cuck a mile off, despite their shy and secretive nature. For the full virtue signalling, inability to answer a question, complete lack of balls and lickspittle smarminess just look for Knighthoods or other honours.

Whilst once given for acts of manliness it seems that Knighthoods are now either given for paperclip organisation skills or extreme cuckliness beyond the beck and call of feminist duty. Indeed the entire civil service operates as a hugely efficient cuckocracy where the most extreme rise to the top.

And there is a reason for this…


Cultural Marxism or the Frankfurt school


Most philosophers spend their time thinking of ways to make the world a better place. To make you richer, freer, more successful or your country more powerful. And in a free market place of ideas those philosophers who demonstrably have a track record of such clearly have an advantage.

There are exceptions, but they’re generally a bit French.

The Frankfurt school is different as it takes it’s inspiration from butthurt. Namely the Marxists who successfully created the conditions for the German proletariat to rise up and seize control after the First world War only for the lazy feckless bastards to… not bother.

To compound this butthurt they then went on to choose an Austrian national socialist with a dodgy tache, which didn’t work out too well.

Frankfurt school philosophy therefore resolved that the only aim was to prevent anyone with a dodgy tache taking power. It was and is designed exclusively as an anti-Nazi ideology.

Hence seeing as the old proletariat wasn’t up to the job they had to find a new one. Another group who could more easily be manipulated and who could control the means of production and all that Marxist whatnot. And they did.


Out with the old proletariat, in with the new.


Whilst your average prole is more interested in getting his end away and the quality and price of beer than politics there is a group of malcontents who are interested in neither.

The paperclip shufflers in every government, admin and HR department. Whilst the local massage parlours may lay mattresses on the pool tables and double time their staff should a new office open, the heady mix of ready cash and low self esteem that characterises the Civil Service is very profitable. Their chances of being distracted otherwise by non paperclip related issues are slim.

And they indirectly control and regulate everything.

Hence rather than having to convince anyone that your ideology is sound or useful you can merely pass it chunk by chunk in pointless EU rules and regulations. Those implementing and enforcing the regulations become Marxists over time purely by dint of their exposure. Those who are particularly susceptible, those who understand it, rise to the top. The cucks.

This is why the Frankfurt school philosophy sits at the heart of the EU. Whilst the civil servants think they work for the Crown they spend the vast majority of their time implementing or enforcing EU rules and regulations. How then are they not a mere extension of the EU Commission?

They love to blame new EU rules for their cockups and bungling but have you ever considered how much time they actually spend figuring out ways to do something despite these rules and regulations?

Take Olly Robbins, the shadowy bureaucrat at the heart of the Brexit fiasco. A committed Marxist even before joining the Civil Service he rose to the top remarkably quickly.

One might even be predisposed to think that his mindset and ideology helped him on his path to promotion.


But it’s the politician’s fault!


How so? True enough that many act like mere Gauleiters however these tend to be Ministers who are constrained by the advice given by the Senior Civil Servants. The more experienced the minister the more cuckly they become.

Those rules and regulations pass through parliament faster than a dodgy vindaloo and with less scrutiny.

It’s true that the politicians are technically responsible though even that appears to no longer be the case. Take David Davis who resigned recently, the first time he saw the Brexit White Paper was on the morning of the Chequers meeting, along with all the other Ministers.

And he was supposedly the democratically appointed Minister responsible. Difficult to be responsible for something that you haven’t even seen.

The MP’s had to wait a further week.

Hence clearly policy is formed by a cuckly cabal who’ve demonstrated their proclivity to Marxist thought by being promoted to the top.

Frankly this is a constitutional crisis right at the heart of Government, but one conducted mainly in the shadows.


Shame, grace and reputation.

As my last post was about rape probably worth discussing how not to be raped. And no, we won’t be discussing male chastity belts or avoiding areas where a violent homosexual might happen to be lurking. Despite the feminist propaganda, such things are highly unlikely.

First off, if a Perfect Rapist enters your life, and especially if you have a family and children, there is nothing unmanly about running for the hills. Just remember to take your family with you. You wouldn’t be alone, hundreds flee to Southern Ireland every year to get away from the feminist police, the SS, and their abuse.




The very antithesis of feminism, one could easily argue that the religions of the last 2000 years have been busily teaching grace in their various ways, and that they only differ in their interpretations of such, only to roll over and die as soon as a blue haired harridan started spouting her filth. That organised religion has abandoned the masses to such a fate should shame them immeasurably. We’ll come back to this.

By grace I am speaking about the mental quality, rather than that of being graceful in movement. Namely the ability to think well of others. Summing the bible up in one line could be done as, “The old Testament showed that laws alone were not enough, to live together people had to embrace grace in their interpersonal dealings.”

There you go, I just saved you a Theology degree. Not that you wanted one.

Feminists however have almost utterly destroyed the concept. And quite deliberately too. If you find a feminist about as sexy as a rotting mackerel then it’s probably because you realise that grace is a function of objective beauty.

Oh and you are sane.

Studies show that conservatives are more attractive, and the retention of grace is a part of this.

So some fucknut is writing a blog telling blokes to be more graceful? Fuck no, I’m saying you should look for it in your women. And here’s why…




Your reputation is important in forming all relationships. Whether friends, family or something more porkable. You were born naked and with no possessions, bar your name. Even your first name came later. If you harm your name you not only harm your wider family, you also make it more difficult to form the sort of relationships you want.

If you want your reputation to be one of a conquistador of women then don’t be surprised if the one you actually really want views you as a human urinal. Then again Mr goody two shoes is unlikely to get much pussy. You makes your choice, but what of when you have no choice?

Let’s say you made the mistake of dating a feminist. You know she hates men but you reckon the power of your pork sword will wow her into admiration and respect.


Feminists one and only identifying feature is a complete lack of grace. Every man is a rapist, every Muslim a gang rapist and every structure, society, alien race or star against them. But you’re different? Please don’t kid yourself.

The one and only guarantee is that she’s slagging you off behind your back. She will be harming your reputation because she is incapable of thinking well of anyone or anything. And that’s before the two of you break up for whatever reason…

Take the hot crazy matrix and realise that even a Unicorn is going to jump occasionally to 10. When they do will they be talking fondly of you?

Now imagine a Tiffany, hairdresser or suchlike. Minus 5 for anyone or thing lacking grace and you’ll be much safer in the long run, no matter how big their tits or bottle blonde their hair.

That bottle blonde who looks as though she spends all her money on cosmetics will be spending your money on them too, and she thinks she’s entitled to do so.

If a women harms your reputation through gossip or deed then dump em. Make it a line in the sand, a boundary. I can guarantee it isn’t the only form of relational aggression she’ll be using.

Play life as a game of enhancing your reputation and you’re on the right track. That means avoiding borderlines, feminists and other scumbags like the plague.




Is usually the thing that drives us. To addiction, to success and to self discovery eventually.

Realise that shame will often not be your fault. In the blue pill world you’ll be presented with situations where you have to eat the lesser of two shit sandwiches. Often too.

Being born into a dysfunctional family, especially where you are shamed for your needs, might lead you to either boom or bust. Yep, even those A grade highly achieving twats are probably motivated by shame as well.

If you have an addiction, it’s probably related to some shame that you can’t put your finger on. Porn, video games, work, drugs, beer. Whatever. Some forms of shame indeed are inherited.

More importantly, for the purposes of not being raped, is to avoid anyone who uses shame to control you. Particularly other blokes.

At the end of the day any young dude has been badly let down by his previous generations. Merely in monetary terms a boy born today in the UK saddles his part of £2 trillion of debt, and as blokes work 600 million hours a year to women’s 400 million it’s an unfair share of the burden. Bugger all of that £2 trillion was spent on your future, rather on other people’s pasts.

If he is going to be one of the decreasing number of blokes to go to University he’ll have to go into massive debt and will probably never own his own house. He will spend far less on himself than an equivalent woman does and pay more tax.

If that young dude is a Muslim then he’s going to be blamed for feminism’s crimes, excluded, scapegoated and probably mocked.

Previous generations, even the priesthood themselves, have allowed the antireligion of feminism to hold sway over every aspect of a young dudes life, you’ll do worse in school, probably have to work in a 3D job and face discrimination at every turn.

Don’t let others control you, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t ascribe blame and shame to those who deserve it.


Lets talk about Rape

And no, I don’t necessarily mean the physical act. Or Rotherham, Telford and the other areas where the social services have allowed and enabled organised mass pedophilic rape to occur. Though we will come back to this.. Particularly the omerta or silence regarding it.

I’m talking about the other meaning and how it applies to blokes, defined by dictionary.com as..

3. an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation:

the rape of the countryside.

So how do you rape a bloke?

How do you abuse, plunder or violate a man? Physical rape is one aspect of this however I wonder whether it is necessarily wrong to equate this to other forms.

I would posit that any man who has been to one of the secret family courts in the UK has likely been raped. Not by being overpowered by a violent homosexual hiding in a cupboard, but by the state.

For instance take Pete Middleton’s 2014 documentary Traffic. Which is rather deliberately difficult to get hold of. Whilst it is listed on Amazon for just £84.99 the reviews relate to the Benicio Del Toro movie of the same name.

It contains a harrowing scene shot on a mobile phone where the police lie to gain entry to a man’s house, and then rip his new born baby from it’s mother’s arms. As a bloke he couldn’t have done more to protect his family, yet it was violated and abused. He was raped.

Traffic 2014 extract

Indeed take all of the victims who contributed footage and their stories to the making of that film. They were raped, raped by the state. Their families abused and despoiled. Often by violent seizure too.

It takes a remarkably brave man to speak out about such things, to tell their stories. They don’t do it for sympathy or the protective cloak of victimhood that women enjoy, merely to warn others of dangers to their own families.

In order to do so they relive their violation. They deserve our compassion and gratitude for doing so.

What do we value?

In order to plunder, despoil or violate it’s worth considering what we, as blokes, value the most. The greater the value to ourselves, the greater the violation.

If cars were what we valued most then the deliberate keying of a man’s car would be the greatest violation, for instance. Outside of those who endlessly watch repeats of Top Gear on Dave this probably isn’t relevant.

I would suggest that the one thing men value above all other things is our relationships. Whether that be friends, family or intimate ones. In order to form relationships your reputation plays a key part. If you have a reputation for being a scumbag then you will struggle. Especially in intimate relationships.

Indeed there is much evidence that men value their intimate relationships far more than women do. Take the following from Dr Tom Golden on relational aggression..

Relational Aggression

As men tend to initiate relationships with women they take relational aggression as a serious threat, though not a personal threat. It therefore slips under the radar in most cases.

Logically if most relational aggression is from women, then it shows that they value the relationship less, though can use the threat of as a means to control. If the relationship ends they will be chased, wined and dined by other blokes. For the bloke they would have to chase, wine and dine.

Most people would agree that a man’s rightful role is to protect his family and to ( at least help) provide for it. Knowing about relational aggression is one step to enable you to do the former; to spot trouble early and prevent it from escalating, potentially into third party abuse.

The Rape epidemic(s)

Do we live in a society where men are the victims of rape? Emphatically yes! In fact it is institutionalised and even celebrated.

Take divorce. From blue skies and on a clear day a man’s wife tells him that she wants a divorce. She has been carrying on an affair unbeknownst to him ( itself an act of relational aggression) and wants to leave him. What are his prospects?

Well going from loving and providing for his family to the stress and torment of divorce proceedings is bad enough. He will more than likely lose his house, have to pay a large part of his wages to the Child Support Agency and will also have his reputation damaged.

Worst of all she will get custody of the children and he will be allowed to ‘visit’ them on weekends. Which is an obscenity. He will be stripped of his right to protect his family and expected merely to provide money.

Note the role of the state here in providing third party abuse. Whilst faultless he will lose his children and most of his possessions and be compelled by the state to comply with the woman’s wishes.

He has been raped. That which he prized most, his familial relationship, has been defiled, violated and abused. Let’s call it what it is.

The only fault here is his wife’s infidelity and relational aggression.

And you wondered why the MGTOW community was growing exponentially..

I can only imagine how a man who is the victim of wrongful paternity feels. Violated? Abused? Almost certainly.

What of a man wrongfully accused of sexual harassment, domestic violence, domestic abuse or even racism? The very accusation of such is rather abusive in my view, not to mention violating his reputation. He might be plundered of his job based upon merely an accusation of the former.

And of his relationship. His wife and kids moved to a domestic violence shelter and eventually rehoused elsewhere. It is an act of rape facilitated by the state.

How dare you! That isn’t proper rape!

Quite. It’s worse.

If I had a choice between being the victim of a violent homosexual or having my family destroyed, children taken into care and reputation wrecked I’d almost certainly, and reluctantly, take one for the team. I wouldn’t be buying Bubba any flowers afterwards but at least that which I prize most would be safe.

Do you think the victims of social services would prize their anal virginity above the safety of their families? Granted there are almost 90,000 children in care and rising, hence almost certainly not enough violent male homosexuals to go around if there were such a perverse choice.

How many social workers are there though?

The Perfect Rapist.

If you were to design the perfect rapist would it look like Bubba just after the prison lights went out or the soap slipped out of your hand in the shower?

Or something else? If you gave the problem to an engineer, what would he come up with?

Let’s say we take one of those awful blue haired creatures you always see on the news protesting about something or other. The butch looking man hating mastodons with cankles always shrieking in someone’s face. Curiously enough they’re usually social workers on the sick.

Let’s give them legal immunity from defamation such that they can lie and destroy reputations at will. Then let’s, as part of their training, indoctrinate them in radical feminism. All men are rapists and all women are victims.

Let’s then make it financially advantageous to their employers that they seek children to snatch and get teachers and the wider public to unknowingly tip them off to situations where they might find it easier. Pay for every penny out of central government funds, such that it costs a local authority nothing. I say easier as I doubt any family no matter how well grounded or loving could survive their malign presence.

Then let’s set up a system of secret courts where ‘justice’ cannot be overseen. Where abuses cannot be covered by the media and even the mention of such could lead to jail.

Well it wouldn’t work… Clearly if said blue haired mastodon perjured themselves repeatedly then someone would notice. It would be their word against the families.

So, let’s call them professionals!

No matter how slovenly or illiterate if we call them professionals and direct the secret courts to give more weight to their testimony than anyone else’s then…. Yes, I think we’ve got it…. Might well be the Perfect Rapist.

Marketing the Perfect Rapist

A good engineer however will ensure that his product is easy to replicate, such that the company producing it can grow.

Well if we want the Perfect Rapist to really succeed then we need to justify their existence. We also need to ensure they are cheap to make. Noone is going to demand more Perfect Rapists just on a whim, and sales is all about establishing a need. Marketing it to the public too and making it an ever expanding industry..

Quite a problem!

Making them cheap is simple enough. The lure of professional status with the lowest entry requirements of any profession should see to that. Hopefully should attract the sociopathic, socially inept, the slobs and the craven.

To establish a need though we are going to need some help. It’s unlikely that people will order the Perfect Rapist from amazon so let’s fire some binmen and charge Perfect Rapists to the taxpayer.

Now if we open our borders to people from cultures hostile to our way of life… and ignore any rapes or crimes they commit then we can say we need Perfect Rapists to protect the very children we are allowing to be raped!

Genius. Perfect engineering.

But, what about whistleblowers?

Our engineer has thought of this, he taps his pipe knowingly, smirks and asks, “What whistleblowers?”

What of the children being raped? They will complain, obviously..

“Ah”, says the engineer, “You haven’t thought it through. We’ll call them racist for complaining. And they’ll be complaining to the Perfect Rapists. People tend to forget that political correctness is a feminist theory of social change.”

Ok, the press and TV stations… Newspapers, the media?

“Staffed mainly by feminists these days old sport. Feminists don’t criticise other feminists, in fact I think you’ll find many of them running stories about how we need more Perfect Rapists to stop the actual rapists. If they mention it at all..”

Social Workers themselves? What about when they retire, move jobs, what if they speak out?

“Hmmm.. There won’t be many, not even a handful” says the engineer. “When their main job is stealing children and they’ve perjured themselves silly to do so they aren’t going to speak against their former employers. Are they now?”.

But… People will notice. People will realise that something is wrong!

“You think? If anything…”, he says lighting his pipe, “..they’ll notice young children being raped by beastly men. Which is a great recruiting sergeant for feminism. All blokes being nasty violent rapists etc.”

Surely the police will do something? Child protection officers and the like?

The engineer shrugs, “Maybe, some. The few males ones. Not many though. You are a bloke and I’m sure you laugh if someone gets hit in the happy sack. Natural reaction, they are a genetic competitor. Course you think all women are princesses who wouldn’t view another woman’s reproductive organs as competitors in the gene pool.. We’ll see.”

This is monstrous. Despicable. An outrage!

“No,” says the engineer whimsically, “This is the UK”.